Skip to main content

Top Tips for Reducing Yarn Faults and Improving Textile Quality

By

Yarn Fault Classification and Remedies for Quality Improvement

Introduction:-

    In the textile industry, maintaining high yarn quality is essential for producing superior fabrics. Faults in yarn can compromise the strength, appearance, and overall quality of the final product. Automatic Yarn Clearers, such as those on autoconer machines, play a vital role in classifying and detecting these faults electronically, enabling efficient quality control. This blog discusses the classification of yarn faults, their causes, and effective remedies to minimize defects.

Yarn Fault Classification

USTER Classimat Defects Classification

Types of Yarn Faults

    Yarn faults are categorized based on their size, length, and severity. The primary classifications include:

  • Neps (N): Small, thick, entangled fiber balls within the yarn.
  • Short Thick Places (A, B, C, D classes): Faults less than 8 cm long with increased cross-section (+100% to +400%).
  • Long Thick Places (E, F classes): Faults exceeding 8 cm with significant thickness.
  • Long Thin Places (G, H, I classes): Areas where yarn diameter is considerably thinner than normal (-30% to -75%).
  • Spinners Doubles: Severe faults where two yarn ends are spun together.
  • Foreign Matter/Contamination: Non-fiber materials detected via optical clearers.

Fault Correction and Remedies

    Addressing yarn faults requires a systemic approach. Fault correction involves both the winding machinery and upstream processes, focusing on reducing irregularities and defects to ensure high yarn quality.

    Understanding Yarn Faults and Defects

    Yarn Irregularities and Imperfections

  • Irregularity (Unevenness): Variations in fiber distribution along the yarn length, affecting uniformity.
  • Imperfections: Extreme variations such as thick places, thin places, and neps.
  • Objectionable Faults: Defects larger than +100% of the normal yarn cross-section, impacting quality and processing.

Classification of Yarn Faults


LOEPFE Classimat Defects Classification

Yarn faults are broadly classified into:-

1. Frequently Occurring Faults

    Detected by Uster Evenness Testers, these faults occur 10 to 5000 times per 1000 meters and include:

  • Thick Places: Cross-sectional size +30% to +100%, length 4-25 mm.
  • Thin Places: Cross-sectional size -30% to -60%, length 4-25 mm.
  • Neps: Small, entangled fiber balls with +140% to +400% size, length around 1 mm.

2. Seldom Occurring Faults

    Rare faults that require extensive testing to detect, including:

  • Slubs: Thick fibers or knots in yarn.
  • Spun-in Fly: Short fibers or fibers missing.
  • Long Thin Places: Over 8 cm, with diameter less than -30%.

Why Avoid Yarn Faults?

Faulty yarns can:-

  • Cause breaks during subsequent processing.
  • Diminish the aesthetic appeal of fabrics.
  • Lead to higher rejection rates and increased production costs.

Causes of Yarn Faults

    Objectionable faults can originate from three main sources:

1. Raw Material

  • Impurities and fiber irregularities contribute to faults (16-30%).

2. Piecing Process

  • Errors during spinning or joining fibers account for 9-16% of faults.

3. Spinning Machine

  • Approximately 50-60% of faults are due to machine-related issues like gear misalignment or improper settings.

Remedies for Yarn Faults

    Effective fault mitigation involves several maintenance and process adjustments:

  • Keep machine surfaces clean.
  • Avoid broken gear teeth; ensure proper gear meshing.
  • Regularly maintain ring frame settings.
  • Ensure proper functioning of clearers and removal of foreign matter.
  • Achieve better fiber individualization during carding.
  • Use correct tension weights and slub catchers during winding.
  • Maintain optimum twist and yarn conditioning.
  • Minimize vibration of bobbins and ensure correct roller and top roller pressures.
  • Use appropriate sizes and shapes for travelers and rings.
  • Maintain optimal humidity in the spinning environment.

Conclusion

Controlling yarn faults is crucial for producing high-quality textiles. Understanding the classification, causes, and remedies of yarn defects enables manufacturers to implement targeted corrective measures, thereby enhancing yarn uniformity, reducing waste, and improving overall product quality.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

If you have any doubts, Pls let me know

Popular posts from this blog

RKM

By
RKM INFORMATION This can be expressed by the “Length of yarn in km” at which yarn will break of its own weight”. This is equivalent to breaking load in g/tex. RKM is the short expression for “Reisskilometer” – “Breaking-kilometre”, which is an unit out of date. E.g.: a Cotton-yarn with 15 RKM means, it would break of its own weight, if you wind off 15 km of the yarn and hang it up in 15 km. Nowadays it is common practice, to use the unit Centi-Newton per Tex (cN/Tex) or gram-force per Tex (gf/Tex). RKM and cN/Tex or gf/Tex are practically the same (a slight difference would be there)   SINGLE YARN STRENGTH (Breaking force) :  This is the force required to break a strand of single yarn. It is expressing Centi-Newton (cN).     STRENGTH (Tenacity) : The Tensile Strength expressed as force per unit linear density is called Tenacity. This is normally expressed as gram force per tex (gf/tex).   CSP (Count Strength Product) : CSP, the bundle strength...
Post a Comment
Read more

LOW RKM REASONS

By
LOW RKM REASONS TO START WITH SLIGHTLY RICHER MIXING AND BACK TO USUAL MIXING% GRADUALLY. AVOID BYPASSING OF THE BEATERS. CHANGING OF THE CARD LINES TO BE AVOIDED . TO START WITH HIGHER NOIL% AND REDUCE GRADUALLY TO USUAL    IF REQUIRED. SOFT WASTE ADDING TO BE AVOIDED FOR FIRST 3 OR 4 MIXINGS. IN SIMPLEX M/C CHECK THE FOLLOWING     a) FALSE TWISTER CONDITION     b) FLOATING CONDENSER CONDITION .     C) DAMAGE COT/APRON .     d) DEFECTIVE SADDLES .     f) TOP ARM LOAD .     g) PRESSER EYE CONDITION .     h) FLUFF ACCUMULATION ON FLYER HOLE .     i) BOBBIN CLEARANCE VARIATION .     j) CONE DRUM NOISE     k) FEED CAN CONDITION         l) SLIVER SPITING . IN SPINNING M/C CHECK THE FOLLOWING:     a) CRISIS-CROSS ROVING .     b) BOBBIN HOLDER ROTATION .     C)DAMAGE COT/APRON.     d)DEFECTIVE SADDLES.     f)TOP ...
Post a Comment
Read more

HOW TO REDUCE CLASSIMATE FAULTS

By
REDUCING CLASSIMATE FAULTS 1) Count wise online Classmate classes wise results to be record on daily basis 2) Before allotting this work we want to educate quality investigator about Classmate faults and also class wise reasons we want to explain. While noting time investigator has highlight which class is having continuous higher side and same one communicate to that concern dept with reasons 3) We want to fix which classes we want to reduce 4) On daily basis monitoring we can get idea in which zone we r having problem and which zone we want to improve the work methods and process  5) Based on trend analysis we want to inspect process auditing and find out practical problems and also Training awareness we want to give to operators for reducing some classes  6) We can take process trials based on Online Classmate results  7) Regularly we want to compare daily Online results Vs Trial sample results for knowing Where we are Note: Choosing of quality investigator is import...
Post a Comment
Read more